A Slowdown for Small Businesses
In
the latest sign that the economic recovery may have lost whatever
modest oomph it had, more small businesses say that they are planning to
shrink their payrolls than say they want to expand them.
That is according to a new reportreleased
Tuesday by the National Federation of Independent Business, a trade
group that regularly surveys its membership of small businesses across
America.
The
federation’s report for May showed the worst hiring prospects in eight
months. The finding provides a glimpse into the pessimism of the
nation’s small firms as they put together their budgets for the coming
season, and depicts a more gloomy outlook than other recent (if equally
lackluster) economic indicators because this one is forward-looking.
While big companies are buoyed by record profits, many small businesses, which employhalf of the country’s private sector workers,
are still struggling to break even. And if the nation’s small companies
plan to further delay hiring — or, worse, return to laying off workers,
as they now hint they might — there is little hope that the nation’s 14
million idle workers will find gainful employment soon.
“Never in the 37-year history of our company have we seen anything at all like this,” said Frank W. Goodnight, president of Diversified Graphics, a publishing company in Salisbury, N.C. He says there is “no chance” he will hire more workers in the months ahead.
“We’re being squeezed on all sides,” he says.
Each
month, the National Federation of Independent Business surveys the
owners of small businesses about how they are doing and where they think
the economy is going. One question asks whether businesses plan to
increase or decrease the number of employees in the next three months.
Economists then calculate a net hiring figure by subtracting the
percentage of companies that plan to downsize from the percentage that
plans to expand.
In
May, the share of companies that planned to shrink their work forces
was one percentage point higher than the share of companies that planned
to expand them, the first time since last September that this indicator
was negative. And even though it was slightly negative, this index, a
fairly reliable indicator of hiring decisions, has been trending
downward all year.
The
unemployment rate has been stubbornly high in the last year, primarily
because companies have stopped hiring, not laying off more workers.
Although layoffs were at a record low in April,
the latest monthly data available, Tuesday’s survey suggests that
workers may soon be challenged by both sides of the employment ledger.
With wages relatively stagnant in recent months, the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey found
that workers’ expectations for their families’ income growth over the
next year were at a record low. This is the first recovery in which,
seven quarters in, there have been zero gains in aggregate wages and
salaries.
Stagnant
wages, coupled with the recent stock market slide and further declines
in housing prices, have left consumers feeling not well-off enough to
significantly increase their spending, which would encourage hiring.
“One
thing you’ve got to understand is that we do not hire workers for the
sake of hiring workers. We hire them to do jobs,” Mr. Goodnight said.
“If we don’t have the work coming in, nothing will make me hire another
person.”
When asked about the “single most important problem”
facing their businesses, about one in four cited “poor sales,”
according to the federation’s survey. Uncertainty over regulations is
also mentioned frequently. About a third of businesses blame either
“taxes” or “government requirements” for their current troubles, leading
some economists to attribute the recent slide in overall business
optimism to Washington’s protracted debates over tax policy, financial
changes and health care.
Meanwhile, larger businesses, sitting on mountains of cash, have been weathering the weak recovery relatively well.
The Business Roundtable CEO Economic Outlook survey,
also released on Tuesday, is a less closely watched report that relies
on responses from the chief executives of larger companies. It found
that the number of large companies expecting their American work forces
to grow in the next six months far outnumbers those that anticipate
shrinkage.
“What
we’ve had is a tale of two recoveries,” said John Ryding, chief
economist at RDQ Economics. “Between large businesses and small
businesses, it is literally the best of times and the worst of times.”
Several factors have helped larger companies succeed, economists say.
Jared
Bernstein, a senior fellow at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities and a former economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R.
Biden Jr., said, “Larger businesses have consistently had more going for
them in this recovery.”
He
added: “They have better access to credit markets. They have greater
ease in exporting abroad where some economies are growing faster than
ours. All that shows up in their profits.”
The
one potential bright spot in the small-business survey involves
industries that have had the smallest job growth but now seem willing to
add jobs, according to William C. Dunkelberg, the chief economist for
the federation.
These
include construction and nonprofessional services like restaurants,
which was crippled by the housing bust. Manufacturing, which had been
the engine of job growth for many months before scaling back in May,
also showed promise.